Analyzing factors influencing land utilization for food production among rural landowners in Ga-Mphahlele Village
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v9i2.24554Keywords:
extension services, food production, land utilization, rural livelihoods, soil fertilityAbstract
Land plays a crucial role in ensuring food production and supporting rural livelihoods in South Africa. However, in Ga-Mphahlele Village, a significant portion of land owned by rural households remains underutilized, leading to reduced food production. This study aimed to analyze factors influencing land utilization for food production among rural landowners in Ga-Mphahlele Village, Limpopo Province. Primary data were collected from 75 rural landowners using structured questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to describe socio-economic characteristics and land utilization patterns, while a binary logistic regression model was applied to determine factors influencing land utilization for food production. The results showed that only 41% of respondents actively utilized their land for food production, while 59% did not. The average age of respondents was approximately 60 years, reflecting an aging farming population. Age, employment status, marital status, access to agricultural extension services, soil fertility, and type of farming equipment were found to influence land utilization significantly. Access to extension services was highly significant, highlighting the importance of institutional support in promoting land utilization. The study concludes that strengthening extension services, improving soil fertility management, supporting vulnerable households, and facilitating access to modern farming equipment can significantly increase and enhance land utilization for food production among rural landowners. These findings provide evidence-based insights for policymakers to design targeted interventions aimed at strengthening rural food production and livelihoods.
Downloads
References
[1] Z. J. Mchiza, E. M. Du Plessis, and W. D. Chikwari, “Food security in South Africa: A review of the literature,” J. Food Sci., vol. 85, no. 5, pp. S1448–S1456, 2020.
[2] B. E. Akinyemi and A. Mushunje, “Land ownership and usage for agriculture: Empirical evidence from South African Living Conditions Survey,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 5, 2019. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1663691.
[3] N. Mango, B. Zamasiya, and K. Nyikahadzoi, “Rural household food security and income: The role of land utilization,” J. Agric. Appl. Econ., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 257–274, 2019.
[4] B. Cousins, “Land reform and rural development in South Africa,” J. Agrarian Change, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 523–544, 2019.
[5] M. Aliber and B. Cousins, “Livelihoods after land reform in South Africa,” J. Agrarian Change, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2019.
[6] L. P. Ndzabandzaba and C. Rabe, “The impact of land tenure security on agricultural productivity in South Africa,” Land Use Policy, vol. 99, 2020.
[7] R. Hall and T. Kepe, “Elite capture and land reform in South Africa,” Rev. Afr. Political Econ., vol. 47, no. 164, pp. 231–248, 2020.
[8] M. E. Mamabolo, “The impact of the implementation of government policy on the spatial distribution of emerging farmers in the Mopani District in the Limpopo Province of South Africa,” University of South Africa, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017.
[9] Molemole Municipality, Integrated Development Plan 2017–2022, 2017.
[10] Statistics South Africa, General Household Survey, Pretoria, South Africa, 2020.
[11] M. A. Sekepe, “Analysing factors hindering small-scale broiler chicken farmers from gaining access to formal markets in Kromhoek village, Blouberg municipality,” University of Limpopo, 2023.
[12] S. A. Rankoana, “Socio-economic characteristics influencing small-scale farming in a rural community in Limpopo Province, South Africa,” Ecology, vol. 48, p. 29, 2014.
[13] J. Thamaga-Chitja and P. Morojele, “Socioeconomic determinants of food production,” Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 374, 2022.
[14] M. M. Masuku, Z. Mthembu, and V. H. Mlambo, “Gendered effects of land access and ownership on food security in rural settings in South Africa,” Front. Sustain. Food Syst., vol. 7, 2023, Art. no. 1158946. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1158946.
[15] S. E. Uhunamure, K. Shale, and M. O. Daramola, “Infrastructure and institutional factors affecting land use,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, 2023.
[16] C. M. Shackleton, “Non-timber forest products in livelihoods,” in Ecological Sustainability for Non-Timber Forest Products, Routledge, 2015, pp. 12–30.
[17] M. Gwacela, Y. T. Bahta, and M. Ngidi, “Analysis of the contribution of home gardens to household food security in Limpopo Province, South Africa,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 6, 2024.
[18] S. I. Hlatshwayo, T. O. Ojo, A. T. Modi, T. Mabhaudhi, R. Slotow, and M. S. C. Ngidi, “The determinants of market participation and its effect on food security of rural smallholder farmers in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces, South Africa,” Agriculture (Basel), vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1072, 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
