Analyzing Supply Chain Risks in the Tea Industry Using SCOR and HOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/dinamis.v13i2.20215Keywords:
Tea Production Process, Delays, Machine Breakdowns, Risk Mitigation, Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR), House of Risk (HOR)Abstract
The tea plantation sector has a complex supply chain, and the production process at the black tea processing company is often affected by various operational issues. One of the main problems is delays in raw material processing caused by the late arrival of wet tea leaves, which are further aggravated by machine breakdowns and a lack of worker discipline. These conditions can disrupt or even halt production, emphasizing the need for effective risk mitigation measures. This study aims to identify risk factors in the black tea production supply chain using the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model and to formulate priority mitigation strategies through the House of Risk (HOR) method. The results of the HOR Phase I analysis identified 21 risk events and 4 priority risk agents with a cumulative Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP) value of 76.82%. The four main risk agents are: (A2) irregularities or delays in the transportation of wet tea leaves, (A6) lack of worker discipline, (A7) machine damage or malfunction, and (A8) low employee awareness during work. The HOR Phase II analysis produced seven mitigation actions, which were ranked based on the Effectiveness to Difficulty Ratio (ETD). The top three priority actions are (PA₁) conducting analysis and evaluation of employee performance (ETD = 6.00), (PA₃) increasing supervision of foremen at each station (ETD = 5.00), and (PA₂) creating a schedule for picking wet tea leaves (ETD = 5.00). Supporting actions include quality control of raw materials (PA₄), routine machine maintenance (PA₅), increasing awareness to work carefully (PA₇), and limiting machine loads to maximum capacity (PA₆). The results indicate that human and managerial factors—including employee performance, supervision, and work scheduling—are the dominant contributors to supply chain risk. Therefore, mitigation strategies should prioritize management and behavioral improvements, supported by technical maintenance and process control, to enhance the efficiency, reliability, and resilience of the black tea supply chain.
Downloads
References
[1] Pujawan, I. Nyoman. 2005. Supply Chain Management Edisi Pertama. Surabaya: Guna Widya. Hemphälä, H. (2014).
[2] Cahyolaksono, B.A, dkk. 2020. Evaluasi Tingkat Kesiapan Manajemen Risiko Rantai Pasok PT Pertamina EP Asset 4: Poleng Field. Jurnal Teknik ITS: Vol. 9, No. 2. ISSN: 2337-3539.
[3] Marchello, Dennis, dkk. 2023. Analisa Mitigasi Risiko Manajemen Rantai Pasokan Menggunakan Pendekatan House of Risk pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Tepung Agar- Agar Instan. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri: Vol. 11, No. 2. ISSN: 2355-6528.
[4] Lokobal, Arif, dkk. 2014. Manajemen Risiko pada Perusahaan Jasa Pelaksana Konstruksi di Provinsi Papus (Study Kasus di Kabupaten Sarmi). Jurnal Ilmiah Media Engineering: Vol. 4, No. 2. ISSN: 2087-9334.
[5] Basorudin, Muhammad, dkk. 2019. Kajian Pesebaran Komoditas Teh: Pengembangan Kawasan perkebunan Teh di Provinsi Jawa Barat Tahun 2015. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian: Vol. 15, No.3. ISSN: 2598-5922.
[6] Ratnasari, Sintya, dkk. 2018. Supply Chain Risk Management in Newspaper Company: House of Risk Approach. AIP Conference Proceedings: Vol. 1931, No.1. DOI: 10.1063/1.5024075.
[7] Ridwan, Asep, dkk. 2020. Perancangan Mitigasi Risiko Rantai Pasok
[8] Pujawan, I. Nyoman dan Laudine H. Geraldin. 2006. House of Risk: A Model for Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management. Business Process Journal: Vol. 15, No. 6. DOI: 10.1108/14637150911003801.
[9] Sinulingga, Sukaria. 2016. Metode Penelitian Edisi 3. Medan: USU PRESS.
[10] Abryandoko, Eko Wahyu dan Mushthofa. 2020. Strategi Mitigasi Resiko Supply Chain dengan Metode House of Risk. Rekayasa Sipil: Vol. 14, No. 1. ISSN: 1978-5658.
[11] Shahin, Arash. 2004. Integration of FMEA and the Kano Model. International Journal of Quality Reliability Management: Vol. 21, No. 7. DOI: 10.1108/02656710410549082.
[12] Sunarto dan Heru Santoso WN. 2020. Buku Saku Analisis Pareto. Magetan: Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya.
[13] Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53–61.
[14] Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.
[15] Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455–470.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 DINAMIS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

