Exchange Structure in The United States Presidential Election Debate 2024: Donald Trump and Kamala Harris

Maryam Ulfa; Muhammad Yusuf; Fikry Prastya Syahputra

Authors

Maryam Ulfa Universitas Sumatera Utara
Muhammad Yusuf Universitas Sumatera Utara
Fikry Prastya Syahputra Universitas Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

Systemic Functional Linguistics, Exchange Role, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, Move

Abstract

This study analyzes the 2024 U.S. presidential election debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris using the Interpersonal Function framework, specifically Exchange Structure (Move) from Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The analysis identifies five Move patterns: "K1", "K2^K1", "K1^K2F", "K1^K2F^K1F", and "A1", along with one dynamic move pattern: Challenge and Response to Challenge (CH-RCH). The findings reveal that Donald Trump adopts a more authoritative and responsive stance in the debate, frequently assuming the role of Primary Knower (K1) to assert his knowledge and authority. He is more engaged in responding to challenges (RCH) rather than initiating them, indicating a focus on defending his credibility. In contrast, Kamala Harris actively challenges (CH) Trump's statements, often taking the Secondary Knower (K2) role by questioning or scrutinizing his claims before asserting her own position. However, she also assumes the Primary Knower (K1) role at times to establish her authority. Trump's debate strategy is centered on defending and reinforcing his credibility, while Harris employs a more confrontational approach, challenging Trump's assertions to cast doubt on his statements. This study contributes to the understanding of power dynamics and interactional strategies in political debates through an SFL-based discourse analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assenova, M. (2010). Critical perspectives on social movements.

Aghaei, K., & Rajabi, M. (2022). Exploring the cohesive devices in written and spoken texts of “Let’s Learn Persian” based on Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) model. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 8(1), 17–35.

Ezzy, D. (2012). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Allen & Unwin.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. John Benjamins.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Rajabi, M., & Farshadi, F. (2024). Critical perspectives on political discourse of the 2016 U.S. presidential debates: A systemic functional linguistics reading. Journal of Critical Applied Linguistics Studies, 1(2), 225–241.

Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L. (2019). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press.

Holmes, D. (2017). Politics is local: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the Electoral College. Palgrave Macmillan.

Yusuf, M., Sinar, T. S., Zein, T. T., & Nurlela, N. (2024). Exchange roles in reviewer-student’s virtual interaction: A case study on English department students’ presentation in Indonesia. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(1).

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2009). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.